Fair warning in advance this is probably going to be long…
I hate commenting on and analyzing
articles like this. Coming from a white, upper-middle class family, who pushed
education, responsibility, and family values, I often think it sounds and feels
hypocritical to comment. You struggle with wanting to give a fair opinion and
worrying that what you say, or your opinion could be misconstrued as racist or prejudicial.
I never imagined being able to speak to the struggles of being a minority in an
educational atmosphere, that was until I became a minority. Over the last ten
years, I became the D word - disabled. “Disabled” is a word I never thought I
would have to use to describe myself. I’ve always had great sympathy for those
who are disabled. I pitied the hardships they faced, admired their tenacity and
plucky spirits in the face of adversity, and thought it was courageous and
brave when they kept functioning in society, trying to have as normal a life as
they possibly could. In short, I was an asshole, not just an asshole but a
self-righteous one, the worst kind of all. I lost my eyesight and became ill, I
developed a permanent disability and found that society and people around me I’ve
known my entire life began to have a different opinion and perception of my
abilities as a human being.
Before I got sick, I had started
preparing to return to university and no one questioned it, there were words of
encouragement, and congratulations. When I talked about having a family, being
married, or getting divorced prior to losing my eyesight everyone was
encouraging and sympathetic. Once you suffer a lack of ability, that perception
changes completely. Ableism is the curse and the wall many people with
disabilities face in an able-bodied world. Statements attesting to courage and
perseverance for living a daily life aren’t encouraging, they’re demoralizing.
There’s nothing courageous in the morning when I shower, get dressed, and leave
my house. Trust me, it’s not a pretty sight some mornings when I have to have
the dogs help to drag myself out of bed, or I’m seizing on the floor. It can
even be described as hilarious when I put on two different shoes because in the
light in my bedroom the black shoe and the dark brown shoe look the same, or if
I haven’t had enough sleep and I’m feeling groggy from one of the six
medications I take daily makes me forget to put shoes on at all, but I wouldn’t
describe myself as courageous.
Ableism came to the forefront in
many facets of my life. The first began when people would tell me about how I
must be so sad I wasn’t going to have a family. “Why wouldn’t I have a family?”
I would ask incredulously, to which people would respond, “How could YOU be a
mother with all your disabilities?” When I told people I was getting divorced,
I was met with horror, “Don’t you want to try and work it out, I mean who is going to want to date you or think about marrying you now?” People would stand
there indignantly waiting for an answer and in the early days I would feel
ashamed, embarrassed, and stupid that I would consider to want things that
“normal” people had.
When I decided to go back to
college, the ableism reared its ugly head and came up in every conversation I
had when I announced my plans. A common response I received was, “Why would you
do that? Won’t that be so hard, especially for you?” I also was met with the
famous statements of, “You get disability, just be happy with that.” However,
my favorite question I was asked by everyone was, “What are YOU going to be
able to do anyways?” During a particularly frustrating class in one of my first
semesters back at Boise State, which I was struggling with the material I met
with the professor during a conference and his response was, “The material is
challenging for normal students, I’m sure it’s especially challenging for
students with disabilities, so be happy with a C.”
I would find myself absolutely
livid to the point I could hardly stand it. What the hell did “especially for
you” mean? Why would college be any different for me than anyone else? Why did
I need to be happy with a C? I considered myself to be a reasonably intelligent
person, but somehow there was this mindset that because my body physically
doesn’t work the way everyone else’s does that it somehow had turned my brain
to mush. For some unknown reason, people seem to think that once you have a
disability that you’re resigned to a life of sitting on a couch watching Judge
Judy and NCIS reruns and drooling on your shirt. That because my body doesn’t
work “normal” that I should be content with giving up and declaring myself
feeble and incapable of anything better.
I felt and often feel pigeonholed, I think in a lot of ways our
educational system pigeon holes minority students and students from low income
backgrounds. We assume that because they come from a low-income neighborhood, or
they’re from a different ethnic or minority group, or don’t use the
vernacular or linguistic patterns we deem as “socially acceptable and correct”
that they’re incapable of maintaining the same level as other students. The
ones who do keep up with their more privileged peers are deemed as exceptional,
while the ones who are more challenging are deemed broken and damaged.
Unfortunately, public education has
become the judge, jury, and executioner for children in an underfunded system,
with overworked employees. Kids who are deemed as problem children or
struggling are often isolated because the teacher doesn’t have time to focus
all their energy on one or two kids, when they’ve got 33 others sitting in the
room depending on them to teach. So we see kids passed along for the sake of passing, handed off to be the next instructors problem, and that how you get kids in high school who read at a third or fourth grade level. We expect less from students who face adversity, like because life has given them more challenges, it's normal for them to not succeed and when they are successful they're exceptional rather than just like everyone else.
I worked in a grade school a few
years ago with kindergarten through fourth graders who tested behind in their
reading comprehension levels and saw firsthand the breakdown between teacher
communication and students. Our demand for a politically correct and soft touch
society leaves these kids thinking they can walk all over the teacher, and the
teacher is frustrated because she can’t control them, and when they call home,
the parents are frustrated because they don’t have behavior issues in the home.
They don’t understand why the teacher isn’t doing their job and controlling the
situation, all the while the teacher is petrified that the wrong harsh tone or “mean”
look could get them fired.
Education and academia breeds “normality” it sets up standardized tests and tells you that you should achieve x rating otherwise you’re not normal or you’re lacking in a skill set. Academia, sets standards on exams, papers, and writing and tells us if we don’t achieve these standards, we’re behind. We’ve stepped away in education from encouraging free thinking and creativity in a lot of ways and instead we tell people that they should conform to the standards that those in as Delpit puts it, the culture of power deems acceptable. The problem is, how do we fix this, which there isn’t an easy solution. You have to be able to see progression and teach material and know the student is learning it, and benefitting from it, but without setting up an individual curriculum plan for each student this is impossible without setting up some standardized margin, and academia and public education doesn’t have the funds to meet each individual students creative and intellectual needs.
Education and academia breeds “normality” it sets up standardized tests and tells you that you should achieve x rating otherwise you’re not normal or you’re lacking in a skill set. Academia, sets standards on exams, papers, and writing and tells us if we don’t achieve these standards, we’re behind. We’ve stepped away in education from encouraging free thinking and creativity in a lot of ways and instead we tell people that they should conform to the standards that those in as Delpit puts it, the culture of power deems acceptable. The problem is, how do we fix this, which there isn’t an easy solution. You have to be able to see progression and teach material and know the student is learning it, and benefitting from it, but without setting up an individual curriculum plan for each student this is impossible without setting up some standardized margin, and academia and public education doesn’t have the funds to meet each individual students creative and intellectual needs.
It seems impossible to design an approach that's both flexible and standardized enough to meet every student's needs, considering how little value is placed on primary education in this country. How can we adapt to what individual people need while also making sure that everyone reaches the same checkpoints? Schools are so underfunded, teachers are exhausted, kids are overwhelmed as it is. You're definitely right when you say that it's not an easy fix.
ReplyDeleteThanks for opening a window on your experience with "ableism," Becca. As you imply, I do think your personal experience speaks to the culture of power that Delpit writes about. As I run through the list of themes she uses to describe that culture (282), most if not all would seem to apply to your experience of being "pigeonholed," and subsequently reduced to an Other who is "different." The last principle, that "those with power are frequently the least aware of--or least willing to acknowledge--its existence" and "those with less power are often most aware of its existence"--would seem to best describe the politely dismissive remarks you've received, especially from teachers. I wonder if you agree?
ReplyDeleteAs I mentioned in my comment on Elise's post, I don't think Delpit is suggesting that educational reform that meets the needs of less privileged students is impossible. Her key argument, in fact, is for a certain kind of listening , and from this comes a "viable synthesis of perspectives." I think it's the exactly kind of dialogue that we're having here.